UNDERSTANDING THE OFFENCE OF CONTAMINATION OF GOODS WITH INTENT TO CAUSE PUBLIC HARM IN NSW

The offence of contaminating goods with the intent to cause public harm is a serious criminal violation in New South Wales (NSW), designed to protect public safety and economic stability from acts that could lead to widespread fear or financial loss. This charge can arise in various scenarios, such as tampering with food products or consumer goods, and carries substantial penalties, including long-term imprisonment. Understanding this offence is crucial for anyone facing or affected by such allegations, as it highlights the importance of expert legal representation to navigate the complex legal landscape. At Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers, we specialise in criminal law and traffic law, providing expert legal representation to defend clients against contamination charges and related offences. As leading Sydney criminal Defence lawyers and traffic law specialists, we are committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome in NSW courts.

In this comprehensive guide, we explore everything you need to know about the offence of contamination of goods with intent to cause public harm in NSW, including its legal definition, penalties, defences, and how a lawyer can help mitigate or dismiss charges. Please note that this page or any other pages on our website (including any other social media platforms for Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers) are not to be considered as a substitute for legal advice or even other professional advice. It should also be noted that accessing of this information from this website does not create a client-lawyer relationship

For legal advice, contact us at info@nslaw.net.au, 0427 101 499, or 02 9793 7016, or visit www.nslaw.net.au.

What Is the Offence of Contamination of Goods with Intent to Cause Public Harm in NSW?

The offence of contaminating goods with the intent to cause public harm is outlined in section 93K of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). This provision criminalises the deliberate or reckless tampering with goods, such as food, drinks, or consumer products, with the aim of generating widespread fear or economic damage. The law is intended to safeguard public health and confidence in commercial goods, preventing incidents that could lead to panic or financial losses for businesses and consumers.

To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. Contamination: The defendant intentionally or recklessly contaminated goods (e.g., injecting a substance into food or altering packaging).
2. Intent to Cause Public Alarm or Economic Loss: The act was done with the purpose of creating fear among the public or causing financial harm (e.g., through product recalls).
3. Unlawful: The contamination was not authorised or justified (e.g., no legitimate quality control purpose).
4. Goods: The items were consumable or commercial products capable of causing harm if contaminated.

The offence can be prosecuted in two forms:

1. Basic Contamination: Standard cases without aggravating circumstances.
2. Aggravated Contamination (section 93KA): When the act causes actual harm or is committed with additional factors, such as using a weapon or in company.

Cases are typically heard in the Local Court (e.g., Parramatta, Liverpool, or Campbelltown) for less severe incidents or the District Court for aggravated offences. The charge often intersects with federal laws if contamination affects interstate commerce, but NSW courts handle most prosecutions.

Examples of Contamination of Goods

• Food Tampering: Injecting needles into strawberries or contaminating bottled water with chemicals to cause public panic.
• Product Sabotage: Altering pharmaceuticals or consumer goods in stores to generate fear and economic loss through recalls.
• Hoax Threats: Making false claims about contaminating goods, charged under section 93M, which carries similar penalties.
• Industrial Sabotage: Contaminating goods in a factory to harm a company’s reputation and cause financial damage.
• Terrorism-Related: Tampering with goods to instil widespread fear, potentially escalating to federal terrorism charges under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).

These incidents can lead to widespread media coverage, amplifying public alarm and economic impacts.

Related Offences

Contamination of goods is often charged alongside or instead of related offences:

• Making Threats to Contaminate Goods (section 93L): Threatening contamination with intent to cause alarm or loss, with up to 10 years imprisonment.
• False Statements Concerning Contamination (section 93M): Making false claims about contaminated goods, with up to 10 years imprisonment.
• Public Mischief (section 93Z): Making false reports to police about contamination, with up to 12 months imprisonment.
• Food Contamination (section 38, Food Act 2003 (NSW)): Tampering with food products, with fines up to $100,000 for individuals.
• Terrorism Offences (section 101.1, Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)): If contamination is linked to terrorism, with life imprisonment.

Penalties for Contamination of Goods with Intent to Cause Public Harm in NSW

The penalties for this offence are stringent, reflecting the potential for widespread harm. Under section 93K of the Crimes Act 1900, the penalties are:

• Maximum Penalty: Up to 10 years imprisonment.
• Aggravated Contamination (section 93KA): Up to 15 years imprisonment if the act causes actual harm or is committed with aggravating factors (e.g., in company or with a weapon).
• Local Court: As a summary offence, the Local Court can impose up to 2 years imprisonment and/or a $5,500 fine (50 penalty units).
• District Court: For indictable cases, the full 10 or 15-year penalty applies, often with a non-parole period for custodial sentences.
• Non-Conviction Outcomes: In exceptional cases (e.g., first-time offenders with minimal harm), courts may impose a section 10(1)(a) dismissal or Conditional Release Order (CRO) under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, avoiding a conviction.
• Fines: Up to $5,500 in the Local Court or higher in the District Court, with potential civil fines for product recalls.

Additional Consequences

A conviction can lead to:

• Criminal Record: Remains on your National Police Certificate for 10 years (or 3 years for juveniles) unless spent under the Criminal Records Act 1991.
• Employment: A criminal record can bar roles in food production, manufacturing, or positions requiring background checks.
• Travel: Countries like the USA and Canada may deny entry for offences involving public harm.
• Reputation: A conviction can damage personal and professional relationships, especially if the incident was media-reported.
• Civil Liability: Victims or businesses may seek compensation for losses through civil proceedings.
• Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs): If contamination targeted individuals, an Apprehended Personal Violence Order (APVO) may be imposed.

Sentencing Considerations

Under section 21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, courts consider:

• Aggravating Factors: Causing actual harm, premeditation, or targeting vulnerable groups (e.g., contaminating children’s products).
• Mitigating Factors: First-time offender, genuine remorse, cooperation with authorities, or lack of actual harm.
• Example: A first-time offender who made a hoax threat without harm may receive a fine, while deliberate contamination causing illness could lead to imprisonment.

How a Sydney Criminal Lawyer Fights a Contamination of Goods Charge

A Sydney criminal defence lawyer employs a range of strategies to defend against a contamination of goods charge, from challenging the prosecution’s evidence to negotiating outcomes. Below are the key approaches used by Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers:

1. Analysing the Prosecution’s Evidence

The prosecution must prove contamination and intent. A lawyer will scrutinise:

• Forensic Evidence: Chemical analysis or product testing to confirm contamination and link it to the defendant.
• Witness Statements: Cross-examine accusers or bystanders to expose (any potential) inconsistencies or bias.
• CCTV Footage: Review footage to confirm the act or lack of intent.
• Police Reports: Identify procedural errors, such as failure to provide a caution (section 122, Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (LEPRA)).

Example: If forensic evidence shows no contamination, a lawyer can seek a dismissal.

2. Challenging Intent or Causation

A lawyer can argue:

• No intent to cause alarm or loss (e.g., contamination was accidental or for personal use).
• The act did not cause actual alarm or loss, reducing the charge’s severity.
• No causation: The public harm resulted from media hype, not the defendant’s actions.

Example: If contamination was due to a manufacturing error, a lawyer can argue lack of intent, seeking a lesser charge.

3. Raising Legal Defences

Several defences can be raised if applicable:

• Lack of Intent: You did not intend to cause alarm or loss (e.g., a prank gone wrong).
• Mistake of Fact: You reasonably believed the act was harmless (e.g., testing a product without realising the risk).
• Duress: You were coerced into the act under threat of harm.
• Mental Health or Cognitive Impairment: If a mental health condition contributed, a lawyer may seek a diversion under section 14 of the Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020.
• Unlawful Police Conduct: Evidence obtained through an illegal search (section 21, LEPRA) can be excluded under section 138, Evidence Act 1995.

Example: If you made a false statement under duress, a lawyer can argue duress, supported by witness testimony.

4. Negotiating Plea Deals

A lawyer can negotiate with NSW Police Prosecutors or the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) to:

• Reduce Charges: Downgrade to making false statements (section 93M) or public mischief (section 93Z).
• Amend Facts: Negotiate with the Police to Amend the police fact sheet to remove aggravating factors, like alleged widespread harm.
• Dismiss Related Charges: Secure withdrawal of additional charges, such as food tampering (section 38, Food Act 2003).

A guilty plea negotiated early can secure a sentencing discount of up to 25% under section 22 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

5. Securing Favourable Sentence Outcomes:

A lawyer can advocate for any of the following sentencing outcomes:

• Section 10(1)(a) Dismissal: No conviction, fine, or penalty.
• Section 10(1)(b) Conditional Release Order (CRO): No conviction, with conditions like good behaviour for up to 2 years.
• Community Correction Order (CCO): Community service or supervision instead of imprisonment.
• Mental Health Diversion: Treatment under section 14 for offenders with mental health issues.

6. Presenting Mitigating Factors

A lawyer can present mitigating factors to reduce penalties:

• Character References: Letters from employers, family, or community members highlighting your good character.
• Remorse: Evidence of apologies, cooperation with authorities, or restitution to affected parties.
• Rehabilitation: Completion of counselling or ethics programs to demonstrate reform.
• Hardship: Proof that a conviction would impact employment or family responsibilities.

Example: For an offender under financial stress, a lawyer might present evidence of counselling to support a reduced sentence.

7. Appealing a Conviction

If convicted, a lawyer can appeal to the District Court or Court of Criminal Appeal within 28 days under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 if:

• The sentence is unduly harsh (e.g., excessive imprisonment).
• New evidence supports your innocence (e.g., testimony showing no intent).
• Procedural errors occurred during the trial.

A lawyer can also assist with a spent conviction under the Criminal Records Act 1991 after a crime-free period (10 years for adults, 3 years for juveniles).

The Court Process for a Contamination of Goods Charge

The court process typically involves:

1. Investigation:
   1. Police or consumer protection agencies collect evidence, such as product samples, CCTV footage, or witness statements.
2. Arrest or Court Attendance Notice (CAN):
   1. Police may arrest you under section 99 of LEPRA or issue a CAN for a Local Court appearance.
3. Bail Application:
   1. A lawyer applies for bail under the Bail Act 2013, arguing you pose no risk.
4. Court Mention:
   1. You enter a plea (guilty or not guilty) in the Local Court. If not guilty, a hearing is scheduled.
5. Hearing or Sentencing:
   1. If pleading not guilty, a hearing examines evidence to determine guilt.
   1. If pleading guilty or found guilty, a sentencing hearing determines penalties.
6. Possible Outcomes:
   1. Non-conviction orders (section 10 dismissal or CRO).
   1. Conviction with fines, imprisonment, or restitution orders.
   1. Mental health diversion under section 14.
7. Appeals:
   1. Appeal to the District Court or Court of Criminal Appeal if the outcome is unfair.

Steps to Take When Facing a Contamination of Goods Charge

To protect your rights and improve your case outcome, follow these steps:

1. Engage a Sydney Criminal Lawyer Immediately:
   1. Contact Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers at info@nslaw.net.au or 0427 101 499 for a free consultation to assess your case and develop a defence strategy.
2. Exercise Your Right to Silence:
   1. Avoid making statements to police without legal advice (section 89, Evidence Act 1995).
3. Gather Evidence:
   1. Collect product samples, witness statements, or lab reports to support your defence.
   1. Provide character references or proof of rehabilitation.
4. Prepare for Court:
   1. Work with your lawyer to present a robust defence or negotiate a plea deal.
5. Show Remorse:
   1. Consider apologetic gestures or completing rehabilitation programs to demonstrate reform.
6. Appeal if Necessary:
   1. If convicted, appeal to the District Court or apply for a spent conviction.

Why Choose Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers?

At Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers, we are dedicated to delivering exceptional representation for contamination of goods, criminal, and traffic law matters in Sydney, NSW. Our team offers:

• Specialised Expertise: In-depth knowledge of the Crimes Act 1900, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, and Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020.
• Proven Results: Securing section 10 dismissals, CROs, and charge reductions across Sydney courts, including Parramatta, Liverpool, and Campbelltown.
• Court Navigation: Expertise in managing cases amidst disruptions, such as the Downing Centre Local Court closure until late 2025.
• Ethical Representation: Adhering to the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) and Solicitors’ Conduct Rules for transparent, reliable advice.
• Accessible Support: Contact us at info@nslaw.net.au, 0427 101 499, or 02 9793 7016, or visit www.nslaw.net.au for a free consultation.

Don’t let a contamination of goods charge derail your future. Our Sydney criminal lawyers and traffic law specialists will fight tirelessly to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome.

Conclusion

The offence of contamination of goods with intent to cause public harm is a serious criminal violation in NSW, carrying penalties of up to 10 or 15 years imprisonment and significant life consequences. A Sydney criminal defence lawyer can defend against this charge by challenging intent, evidence, or causation, raising defences like mistake of fact or mental health diversions, and securing reduced charges or sentences. At Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers, we leverage our expertise to deliver tailored strategies, ensuring your record, career, and freedom are safeguarded. Whether facing a contamination charge for a hoax threat or actual tampering, our team is here to guide you through the legal process.

Take control of your case today. Contact Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers at info@nslaw.net.au, 0427 101 499, or 02 9793 7016, or visit www.nslaw.net.au to schedule a free consultation. Let us help you fight your contamination of goods charge and achieve the best possible result in NSW courts.

Why Choose Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers Criminal Lawyers & Traffic Lawyers YOUR Leading Sydney Criminal Defence & Traffic Lawyers to represent you in your Traffic Law Matter?

Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers are the leading Law firm in Traffic Law matters as our office appears at ALL Courts in NSW on a regular basis in ALL Traffic Law matters.  No matter is too complex for Nicopoulos Sabbagh lawyers, your Traffic Sydney Lawyers, so be sure to book your first Free Consultation today!

GOING TO COURT?

It is very important that you speak with a lawyer so that you can get the appropriate legal advice which you require prior to going to court.

Our team of experienced solicitors are there for you and can help you answer all your questions, so be sure to contact your Sydney Lawyers, Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers.

_{*This article correctly reflects the Laws of NSW as of 3^rd August 2025.}

_{*Please note that this page or any other pages on our website (including any other social media platforms for Nicopoulos Sabbagh Lawyers) are not to be considered as a substitute for legal advice or even other professional advice. It should also be noted that accessing of this information from this website does not create a client-lawyer relationship}